{"id":89,"date":"2022-03-06T22:50:29","date_gmt":"2022-03-06T22:50:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/?page_id=89"},"modified":"2022-06-20T15:13:57","modified_gmt":"2022-06-20T15:13:57","slug":"doc","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/?page_id=89","title":{"rendered":"Text"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00cdr\u00e1sok \/ Writings<\/span>
\nT\u00f6rt\u00e9nelem \u00e9s\/vagy reg\u00e9ny<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Korunk, 2015. 8. sz., pp. 3-12.)
\nSomfai L\u00e1szl\u00f3 sz\u00fclet\u00e9snapj\u00e1ra<\/span><\/a> (pdf<\/a>, Muzsika 2014. augusztus, pp. 2.)
\nFelejt\u00e9s \u00e9s kisaj\u00e1t\u00edt\u00e1s az irodalomban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Alf\u00f6ld, 2013., pp. 35-55.)
\nWagner or Beethoven? Shifts in the Musical Taste of Virginia Woolf<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2012., Neohelicon 39., pp. 89-103.)
\nA Conversation between Zolt\u00e1n Kocsis and Mih\u00e1ly Szegedy-Masz\u00e1k on the Oeuvre of Ferenc Liszt<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2012., Hungarian Studies 26. 1. sz., pp. 141-161.)
\nThe Literary Canon of Ferenc Liszt<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2012, Hungarian Studies 27. 1. sz., pp. 123-140.)
\nA m\u0171 \u00f6nazonoss\u00e1ga \u00e9s az elemz\u00e9s kock\u00e1zatai<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2011., Magyar Zene XLIX. \u00e9vfolyam, 1. sz. febru\u00e1r, pp. 5-16.)
\nThe Hungarian Reception of George Eliot in Hungary<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2011., Hungarian Studies 25. 1. sz., pp. 315-328.)
\nThe Status of the Woman Writer in Hungary<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2011., Hungarian Studies 25. 1. sz., pp. 119-126.)
\nA ford\u00edt\u00e1s h\u0171s\u00e9ge: k\u00eds\u00e9rt\u00e9s vagy \u00e1br\u00e1nd?<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Alf\u00f6ld 2010., pp. 45-51.)
\nMagyar \u00e9s vil\u00e1girodalom<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Magyar Tudom\u00e1ny 2010\/12. sz., 1502-1510.)
\nThe Reevaluated Past: The Memory Of The Dual Monarchy in Hungarian Literature<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2009., Hungarian Studies 23. 2. sz., pp. 247-266.)
\nHang \u00e9s sz\u00f3, nemzeti \u00e9s vil\u00e1gm\u0171v\u00e9szet<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2008., Alf\u00f6ld 59., 3. sz., pp. 32-43.)
\nN\u00e9meth G. B\u00e9la<\/span> (1925–2008) (pdf<\/a>, 2008. Magyar Tudom\u00e1ny 11. sz., pp. 1390-1393.)
\nA m\u0171v\u00e9szetek tudom\u00e1nyk\u00f6zi kutat\u00e1sa<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Literatura 2007. pp. 3-18.)
\nThe Intellectual and Cultural Scene In The Dual Monarchy<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2007., Hungarian Studies 21. 1-2. sz., pp. 261-297.)
\nA hagyom\u00e1ny \u00fajszer\u0171s\u00e9ge: Ezra Pound \u00e9s a zene<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Alf\u00f6ld 2007. pp. 70-80.)
\nNemzeti kult\u00fara \u00e9s vil\u00e1gsz\u00ednvonal: fesz\u00fclts\u00e9g vagy \u00f6sszhang. Mahler \u00e9s a magyar szellemi \u00e9let<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2006., Muzsika pp. 11-17.)
\nAz alkot\u00f3i folyamatt\u00f3l a hat\u00e1st\u00f6rt\u00e9netig. L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Vik\u00e1rius and Vera Lampert (eds.) Essays in Honor of L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Somfai on his 70th Birthday<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2006, Muzsika 49. 8. sz., pp. 41-43.)
\nAz \u00f6sszehasonl\u00edt\u00f3 m\u0171v\u00e9szettudom\u00e1ny t\u00e1vlatai. K\u00e9kesi Zolt\u00e1n \u00e9s Petern\u00e1k Mikl\u00f3s (szerk.): K\u00e9p – \u00edr\u00e1s – m\u0171v\u00e9szet. Tanulm\u00e1nyok a 19-20. sz\u00e1zadi k\u00e9pz\u0151m\u0171v\u00e9szet \u00e9s irodalom kapcsolat\u00e1r\u00f3l.<\/span> R\u00e1ci\u00f3, Budapest, 2006. – ismertet\u00e9s (pdf<\/a>, 2006., Literat\u00fara pp. 299-301.)
\nHungarian Writers In The 1956 Revolution<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2006., Hungarian Studies 20. 1. sz., pp. 75-82.)
\nMagyar irodalomtudom\u00e1ny a huszonegyedik sz\u00e1zad elej\u00e9n<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2006., Magyar Tudom\u00e1ny 167. 7. sz., pp. 787-793.)
\nDu discours autor\u00e9flexif dans les \u0153uvres de Kosztol\u00e1nyi<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2006., Cahiers d’\u00e9tudes hongroises 13. sz., pp. 63-73.)
\nM\u00e1rai S\u00e1ndor (1900-1989)<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2002-2005, Eml\u00e9kbesz\u00e9dek az MTA elhunyt tagjai felett, Bp. MTA, 2006., pp. 269-282.)
\nThe Legacy of Nineteenth-Century Hungarian Conservatism<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2005., Neohelicon XXXII, 1., pp. 17-23.)
\nN\u00e9meth G. B\u00e9la nyolcvan\u00e9ves<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Literatura, 2005.)
\nMegford\u00edtott id\u0151rend: A t\u00f6rt\u00e9nelmi reg\u00e9nyr\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2005., Alf\u00f6ld 56. 3. sz., pp. 27-37.)
\nNational and Comparative Literature in the Age of Globalisation<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2005., Hungarian Studies 19. 2. sz., pp. 267-276.)
\n\u00d6n\u00e9rtelmez\u00e9s \u00e9s reg\u00e9nyelm\u00e9let<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2004., Filol\u00f3giai K\u00f6zl\u00f6ny 50. 1-2. sz., pp. 5-16.)
\nAz \u00e9rtelmez\u00e9s fordulatai: Henry James: The Turn of the Screw<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2004., Alf\u00f6ld 55., pp. 20-41.)
\nNational Literatures in the Age of Globalisation<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2004., Hungarian Studies 18. 1. sz., pp. 63-72.)
\nNemzeti irodalom az egys\u00e9ges\u00fcl\u0151 vil\u00e1gban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2004., Akad\u00e9miai \u00c9rtes\u00edt\u0151\/Magyar Tudom\u00e1ny 8. sz. pp. 824-835.)
\nCanon, Translation and Literary History<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2003., Across Languages and Cultures 4 (1), pp. 5-18.)
\nKeywords in Literary History<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2003., Neohelicon 30, 2., pp. 15-23.)
\nLiterary History and National Identity<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2003., Neohelicon 30, 1.,pp. 109-115.)
\n1911: \u00daj\u00edt\u00e1s az irodalomban \u00e9s a zen\u00e9ben. Bart\u00f3k B\u00e9la befejezi A k\u00e9kszak\u00e1ll\u00fa herceg v\u00e1ra zongorakivonat\u00e1t<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2003., Literatura, pp. 378-381.)
\n\u00daj magyar irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2003., Literatura, pp. 339-345.)
\nKulcsszavak az irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net-\u00edr\u00e1sban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2003., Literatura, pp.235-245.)
\nIlly\u00e9s \u00e9s a francia irodalom<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2003., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net, pp. 3-20.)
\nDer Aussenstehende und der Betroffene: Die Ironie des Verstehens<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2003., Hungarian Studies 17. 2. sz., pp.213-222.)
\nThe Pitfalls of Translating Terminology. Sa\u0301ndor Radn\u00f3\u0301ti, The Fake: Forgery and Its Presence in Art, trans. by Ervin Dunai.<\/span> New York: Oxford, 1999. (pdf<\/a>, 2002., Semiotica 139\u20131\/4., pp. 393-398.)
\nHenry James in Hungary<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2002., Neohelicon XXIX, 1., pp. 275-282.)
\nAz \u00fajraolvas\u00e1s k\u00e9nyszere: Esti Korn\u00e9l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2002., Alf\u00f6ld, pp. 88-101.)
\nHagyom\u00e1ny \u00e9s (\u00fajra)\u00e9rtelmez\u00e9s: Esterh\u00e1zy magyarul \u00e9s idegen nyelven<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2002., Alf\u00f6ld, pp. 86-94.)
\nEgy m\u0171faj kock\u00e1zatai<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2002., Alf\u00f6ld, pp. 17-36.)
\nThe Aftermath of the 1848 Revolution<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2002., Hungarian Studies 16. 2. sz., pp. 173-183.)
\nA ford\u00edthat\u00f3s\u00e1g es\u00e9lyei<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2001., Tiszat\u00e1j 9. sz. (szeptember), pp. 79-87.)
\n“Van, ami nincs”. Magyars\u00e1gtudom\u00e1ny: elm\u00e9let vagy f\u00f6ladat?<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2001., Irodalmi Szemle, pp. 179-186.)
\nMagyar eszt\u00e9tika 1826-b\u00f3l. Greguss Mih\u00e1ly: Az eszt\u00e9tika k\u00e9zik\u00f6nyve. Latinb\u00f3l ford\u00edtotta Polg\u00e1r Anik\u00f3.<\/span> Kalligram, Pozsony, 2000. 263 pp (pdf<\/a>, 2001., Literatura 1. sz., pp. 106-109.)
\nMegszak\u00edtott folytonoss\u00e1g a magyar t\u00f6rt\u00e9nelemben. Romsics Ign\u00e1c: Magyarorsz\u00e1g t\u00f6rt\u00e9nete a XX. sz\u00e1zadban.<\/span> Osiris, Budapest, 1999. 662 pp. (pdf<\/a>, 2001., Literatura, pp. 103-109.)
\nA k\u00e1non mibenl\u00e9te: remekm\u0171 \u00e9s fejl\u0151d\u00e9st\u00f6rt\u00e9net<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Alf\u00f6ld 2001. december, pp. 37-48.)
\nK\u00eds\u00e9rlet az \u00fajra\u00e9rtelmez\u00e9sre: az Akad\u00e9miai Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2001., Alf\u00f6ld, pp. 39-50.)
\nBart\u00f3k and Literature<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2001., Hungarian Studies 15. 2. sz., pp. 245-254.)
\nV\u00f6r\u00f6smarty and the Romantic Fragment<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2001., Hungarian Studies 15. 1. sz., pp. 3-10.)
\nA Conservative Reading of Jacques Derrida<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2001., Neohelicon XXXVIII, 2., pp. 47-50.)
\nBart\u00f3k’s Place in Cultural History<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2000., Studia Musicologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae T. 41, Fasc. 4, pp. 457-465.)
\nA romantikus Pet\u0151fi. Marg\u00f3csy Istv\u00e1n: Pet\u0151fi S\u00e1ndor.<\/span> Korona, Budapest, 1999. 312 pp. (pdf<\/a>, 2000., Literatura, pp. 221-225.)
\nNem hallott dallamok \u00e9s nem l\u00e1tott festm\u00e9nyek: T\u00e1rsm\u0171v\u00e9szetek a romantikus sz\u00e9ppr\u00f3z\u00e1ban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2000., Literatura, pp. 118-132.)
\nA t\u00f6rt\u00e9nelem elk\u00e9pzelt hitele. Esterh\u00e1zy P\u00e9ter: Harmonia Caelestis<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2000., Kort\u00e1rs 2. sz., pp. 106-111.)
\nFrom Enlightenment Universalism to Romantic Nationalism<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2000., Hungarian Studies 14. 2. sz., pp. 181-191.)
\nK\u00eds\u00e9rlet az \u00fajra\u00e9rtelmez\u00e9sre: az akad\u00e9miai irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2000., AM KozgyEload 1-2., pp. 57-70.)
\nAz \u00fajra\u00e9rtelmez\u00e9s k\u00e9nyszere (Kem\u00e9ny Zsigmond k\u00e9t r\u00f6pirata a forradalomr\u00f3l)<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 2000., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net 81., pp. 3-14.)
\nThe Legitimacy of a Western Canon<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1999., Neohelicon XXVI\/2., pp. 85-90.)
\nA Nemzeti hagyom\u00e1nyok id\u0151szer\u0171s\u00e9ge<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1999., Val\u00f3s\u00e1g 42. 6.sz., pp. 31-43.)
\nA Nyugat \u00e9s a vil\u00e1girodalom<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1999., AM_Szekfoglalok 3. sz., pp. 1-20.)
\nA Nemzeti hagyom\u00e1nyok id\u0151szer\u0171s\u00e9ge<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1999., AM KozgyEload., pp. 31-47.)
\nA Nyugat \u00e9s a vil\u00e1girodalom<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Alf\u00f6ld 1999. 5. sz., pp. 54-70.)
\nKosztol\u00e1nyi et la Tradition Stoique<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1998\/99, Hungarian Studies 13. 1. sz., pp 77-82.)
\nPostmodernity and Postcommunism<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1998., European Review Vol. 6. No. 1., pp. 53-62.)
\nForradalom a fest\u0151 szem\u00e9vel. Barab\u00e1s Mikl\u00f3s \u00e9s 1848<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1998., Magyar Nemzet 1998. m\u00e1rcius 14., pp. 24.)
\nA romantika: vil\u00e1gk\u00e9p, m\u0171v\u00e9szet, irodalom<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1998., Literatura, pp. 333-346.)
\nFord\u00edt\u00e1s \u00e9s k\u00e1non<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1998., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net 79., pp. 63-82.)
\nA k\u00e1nonok hi\u00e1baval\u00f3s\u00e1ga: Kosztol\u00e1nyi a vil\u00e1girodalomr\u00f3l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1998., Alf\u00f6ld 3. sz., pp. 42-53.)
\nOn the Uses and Limits of Multiculturalism<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1997., Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies Vol. 3, No. 1., pp. 45-51.)
\nThe Rise of Intermedial Research. Peter V. Zima (ed.), Literatur intermedial: Musik \u2014 Malerei \u2014 Photographie \u2014 Film.<\/span> Darmstandt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1995. (pdf<\/a>, 1997., Semiotica 115-3\/4., pp. 397-400.)
\nThe Permanence And Mutability Of Aesthetic Values<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1997., Hungarian Studies 12. 1-2. sz., pp. 93-105.)
\nA m\u0171v\u00e9szi \u00e9rt\u00e9kek \u00e1lland\u00f3s\u00e1ga \u00e9s v\u00e1ltoz\u00e9konys\u00e1ga: Babits eur\u00f3pai irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9nete<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1997., Alf\u00f6ld 10. sz., pp. 48-61.)
\nIssue Editor’s Preface<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Hungarian Studies 1997.)
\nThomas Bender and Carl E. Schorske, editors. Budapest and New York: Studies in Metropolitan Transformation, 1870-1930.<\/span> New York: Russell Sage Foundation. 1994. Pp. xiv, 400. (pdf<\/a>, American Historical Review 1996. October, pp. 1176-1178.)
\nThe Rise And Fall Of Bourgeois Literature In Hungary<\/span> (1945-1949) (pdf<\/a>, 1998\/99, Hungarian Studies 13. 2. sz., pp. 199-214.)
\nBonyhai G\u00e1bor (1941-1996)<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Literatura 1996. 3. sz., pp. 418-420.)
\nA nyelvhaszn\u00e1lat meg\u00faj\u00edt\u00e1s\u00e1nak hagyom\u00e1nya a modern reg\u00e9ny\u00edr\u00e1sban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Literatura 1996., pp. 311-336.)
\nRadn\u00f3ti Mikl\u00f3s \u00e9s a holokauszt irodalma<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Literatura 1996. 2. sz., pp. 216-231.)
\nA p\u00e1rbesz\u00e9d \u00edg\u00e9rete. Kar\u00e1tson Endre: Baudelaire aj\u00e1nd\u00e9ka<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, kort\u00e1rs 1996. 2. sz., pp. 111-116.)
\nAz \u00fajraolvas\u00e1s k\u00e9nyszere.<\/span> (A rajong\u00f3k) (pdf<\/a>, 1996., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net 76., pp. 30-49.)
\nAz \u00fajra\u00e9rtett hagyom\u00e1ny: az Alf\u00f6ld St\u00fadi\u00f3 antol\u00f3gi\u00e1j\u00e1r\u00f3l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1996., Alf\u00f6ld 47. 8. sz., pp. 72-75.)
\nNational and International Implications in Radn\u00f3ti’s Poetry<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1996., Hungarian Studies 11. 1. sz., pp. 13-28.)
\nZ\u00e1rsz\u00f3<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1996., Alf\u00f6ld, pp. 104-108.)
\nN\u00e9meth G. B\u00e9la hetven\u00e9ves<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1995., Literatura 1. sz., 3-6.)
\nA k\u00e1nonok szerepe az \u00f6sszehasonl\u00edt\u00f3 kutat\u00e1sokban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1995., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net 76., pp. 5-36.)
\nThe Protestant Review: Its Past And Present<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1995., Hungarian Studies 10. 1. sz., pp. 55-63.)
\nAz \u00edr\u00e1stud\u00f3k felel\u0151ss\u00e9ge K\u00f6z\u00e9p-Eur\u00f3p\u00e1ban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1995., Alf\u00f6ld 46. 1. sz., pp. 52-63.)
\nAz \u00f6sszehasonl\u00edt\u00f3 irodalomkutat\u00e1s id\u0151szer\u0171s\u00e9ge<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1994., literatura 2. sz., pp. 192-203.)
\nMene, Tekel. Ottlik G\u00e9za: Iskola a hat\u00e1ron (\u00dajraolvas\u00e1s)<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1994., Literatura pp. 3-28.)
\nConservatism, Modernity And Populism In Hungarian Culture<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1994., Hungarian Studies 9. 1-2. sz., pp. 15-37.)
\nKosztol\u00e1nyi nyelvszeml\u00e9lete<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1994., Alf\u00f6ld 8. sz. (aug.), pp. 46-59.)
\nBarab\u00e1s Mikl\u00f3s \u00e9s a \u201948-as forradalom<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1993., Magyar Nemzet 1993. m\u00e1rcius 13., pp. 19.)
\nAz irodalom t\u00f6rt\u00e9neti s elm\u00e9leti vizsg\u00e1lata<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1993., Literatura pp. 193-205.)
\nA hontalans\u00e1g irodalma. Hat\u00e1r Gy\u0151z\u0151r\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1993., Kort\u00e1rs 2. sz., pp. 103-108.)
\nL\u00e1tv\u00e1nyszer\u0171s\u00e9g \u00e9s bibliai p\u00e9ld\u00e1zat B\u00e1nffy Mikl\u00f3s \u00edr\u00f3i m\u0171veiben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1993., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net pp. 775-801.)
\nVincent B. Leitch: Amerikai irodalomelm\u00e9let \u00e9s irodalomkritika – a harmincas \u00e9vekt\u0151l a nyolcvanas \u00e9vekig.<\/span> Janus Pannonius Tudom\u00e1nyegyetem B\u00f6lcs\u00e9szettudom\u00e1nyi Kar, P\u00e9cs, 1992. 401 old., \u00e1.n. (pdf<\/a>, 1993., Buksz 491-493.)
\nDer\u00e9ky P\u00e1l: A vasbetontorony k\u00f6lt\u0151i. Magyar avantg\u00e1rd k\u00f6lt\u00e9szet \u0430 XX. sz\u00e1zad m\u00e1sodik \u00e9s harmadik \u00e9vtized\u00e9ben.<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1993., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net pp. 324-330.)
\nA reg\u00e9ny, amint \u00fajraolvassa \u00f6nmag\u00e1t. Esterh\u00e1zy P\u00e9ter: Termel\u00e9si-reg\u00e9ny.<\/span> Magvet\u0151, \u00e9. n. 3. kiad\u00e1s. 476 oldal (pdf<\/a>, 1993., Holmi pp. 2021-1022.)
\nEugen Thurner, Walter Weiss, J\u00e1nos Szab\u00f3, Attila Tam\u00e1s (eds). “Kakanien”: Aufs\u00e4tze zur \u00f6sterreichischen und ungarischen Literatur, Kunst und Kultur um die Jahrhundertwende<\/span> (Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3-Verlag der \u00d6sterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien. 1991. 447 pp.) (pdf<\/a>, 1993., Hungarian Studies 1. sz., pp. 161-163.)
\nKonzervativizmus, moderns\u00e9g, n\u00e9pi mozgalom<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1993., 2000, 9. sz., pp. 41-46.)
\nFelmagasztos\u00edt\u00e1s \u00e9s t\u00f6nkret\u00e9tel: nyelv a k\u00e9t h\u00e1bor\u00fa k\u00f6z\u00f6tti reg\u00e9nyben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1992., Literatura 3. sz., 221-226.)
\nA bizony(talan)s\u00e1g \u00e1br\u00e1ndja: k\u00e1nonk\u00e9pz\u0151d\u00e9s a posztmodern korban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1992., Literatura pp. 119-133.)
\nSok, de nem minden. Esterh\u00e1zy P\u00e9ter: Hahn-Hahn gr\u00f3fn\u0151 pillant\u00e1sa<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1992., Jelenkor 1. sz., pp. 277-280.)
\nFarnbauer G\u00e1bor: Az ibolya illata.<\/span> Kalligram Kiad\u00f3, 1992 (pdf<\/a>, 1992., Kort\u00e1rs 2. sz., pp. 118-119.)
\nSzerepj\u00e1tsz\u00e1s \u00e9s k\u00f6lt\u00e9szet: \u00d6sszhang vagy ellentmond\u00e1s?<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1992., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net pp. 751-728.)
\nJoseph Zsuffa: B\u00e9la Bal\u00e1zs, The Man and the Artist.<\/span> Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1987. (pdf<\/a>, 1991\/92, Hungarian Studies, pp. 231-232.)
\nA k\u00e9tarc\u00fa [Sz\u00e9chenyi Istv\u00e1n]<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1991., Magyar Nemzet 1991. szeptember 11., pp. 9.)
\nOn the Uses and Limits of Structural Analysis for Literary Scholarship<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1990., Semiotica 78. 1-2., pp. 1-49.)
\nFrom Thematic Criticism to Semiotics. Lajos Elkan, Les voyages et les proprietes d’Henri Michaux.<\/span> New York: Peter Lang, 1988. (pdf<\/a>, 1990., Semiotica 82. 3-4., pp. 349-351.)
\nThe Rise and Fall of Literary and Artistic Canons<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1990., Neohelicon XVII\/1., pp. 129-159.)
\nAz irodalmi m\u0171 alaktani hat\u00e1selm\u00e9let\u00e9r\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1990., Literatura pp. 30-76.)
\nTragikum \u00e9s ir\u00f3nia Kem\u00e9ny Zsigmond t\u00f6rt\u00e9netszeml\u00e9let\u00e9ben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1990., ItK 1.sz., pp.94-100.)
\nGeorge Bisztray: Hungarian-Canadian Literature.<\/span> University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1987. 116 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1989., Hungarol\u00f3giai \u00c9rtes\u00edt\u0151 11, 3-4., pp. 323-324.)
\nFom Social Commitment To Art For Art’s Sake<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1989., Hungarian Studies 5. 2. sz., pp. 191-195.)
\nV\u00e9gs\u0151 \u00fczenet a sz\u00e1m\u00fczet\u00e9sb\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1989., 2000 5. sz., pp. 51-55.)
\nV\u00e1laszt\u00e9kosan megmunk\u00e1lt f\u00f6lsz\u00edn – m\u00e9lys\u00e9g n\u00e9lk\u00fcl: Julian Barnes: Staring at the Sun (Napban\u00e9z\u00e9s).<\/span> Jonathan Cape, London, 1986. (pdf<\/a>, 1989., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 453-454.)
\nAz \u00f6n\u00e9letrajz, amint \u00edrja \u00f6nmag\u00e1t: Alain Robbe-Grillet: Le miroir qui revient.<\/span> Les Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1984; Ang\u00e9lique ou l’enchantement. Les Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1987. (pdf<\/a>, 1989., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 762-764.)
\nMagyarorsz\u00e1g es\u00e9lyei. Eszmecsere a rem\u00e9nys\u00e9g tav\u00e1n\u00e1l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1988\/89, Hitel, 2.sz., pp. 53-55.)
\nNotes Toward a Historical Definition of Realism<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1988., Neohelicon XV\/2., pp. 31-54.)
\nRomantic Drama In Hungary<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1988., Hungarian Studies 4. 2. sz., pp. 195-212.)
\n[“Radn\u00f3ti S\u00e1ndor azt \u00edrja\u2026”]<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1988., Kort\u00e1rs 2. sz., pp. 161-166.)
\nMusil \u00e9s Ottlik<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1987., \u00daj \u00cdr\u00e1s, pp. 73-78.)
\nBarab\u00e1s Mikl\u00f3s \u00f6n\u00e9letrajza. Sajt\u00f3 al\u00e1 rendezte, az el\u0151sz\u00f3t \u00e9s a jegyzeteket \u00edrta: Banner Zolt\u00e1n.<\/span> Dacia K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, Kolozsv\u00e1r-Napoca, 1985. 264 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1987., Hungarol\u00f3giai \u00c9rtes\u00edt\u0151 9. 3-4. sz., pp. 16-18.)
\nWilliam H. Gass: Habitations of the Word. Essays.<\/span> New York, 1985. Simon and Schuster, 288. (pdf<\/a>, 1987., Helikon, pp. 228-230.)
\nRichard Pearce: The Novel in Motion. An Approach to Modern Fiction.<\/span> Columbus, 1983. Ohio State University Press, XIV + 155. (pdf<\/a>, 1987., Helikon, pp. 220-222.)
\nModern \u00e9s posztmodern: ellentmond\u00e1s vagy \u00f6sszhang?<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1987., Helikon, pp. 43-58.)
\nManfred P\u00fctz and Peter Freese, eds: Postmodernism in American Literature. A Critical Anthology.<\/span> Darmstadt, 1984. Thesen Verlag, 238. (pdf<\/a>, 1987., Helikon, pp. 43-58.)
\nMartin Pops: Home Remedies. Amherst, 1984.<\/span> The University of Massachusetts Press, 147. (pdf<\/a>, 1987., helikon, pp. 209-211.)
\nThe Life and Times of the Autobiographical Novel<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1986., Neohelicon XIII\/1., pp. 83-104.)
\nNagy K\u00e1roly: Magyar szigetvil\u00e1gban ma \u00e9s holnap.<\/span> P\u00fcski, New York, 1984.159 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1986., Hungarol\u00f3giai \u00c9rtes\u00edt\u0151 8, 3-4., pp. 236-237.)
\nK\u00f6rk\u00f6r\u00f6ss\u00e9g \u00e9s transzcendencia a Pacsirt\u00e1ban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1986., Literatura, pp. 27-42.)
\nA megv\u00e1laszolatlan k\u00e9rd\u00e9s<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1986., Kort\u00e1rs 2. sz., pp. 153-156.)
\nA m\u00fal\u00e1s elpuszt\u00edthatatlans\u00e1ga<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1986., Kort\u00e1rs 4. sz., pp. 145-150.)
\nLor\u00e1nt Czig\u00e1ny: The Oxford History of Hungarian Literature: From the Earliest Times to the Present.<\/span> Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1984. 582 pp. (pdf<\/a>, 1986., Hungarian Studies 2. 1. sz., pp. 163-166.)
\nNagy K\u00e1roly: Magyar szigetvil\u00e1gban ma \u00e9s holnap.<\/span> New York, P\u00fcski, 1984. 159 pp. (pdf<\/a>, 1986., Hungarian Studies 2. sz., pp. 303-304.)
\nDalma Hunyadi-Brunauer–Stephen Brunauer: Dezs\u0151 Kosztol\u00e1nyi.<\/span> M\u00fcnchen, 1983. (Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen des Finnisch-Ugrischen Seminars an der Universit\u00e4t M\u00fcnchen. Herausgegeben von Gerhard Ganschow.<\/span> Serie C, Miscellania. Band 15.) 250 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1985., ItK 3. sz., pp. 363-366.)
\nL\u00f3r\u00e1nt Czig\u00e1ny: The Oxford History of Hungarian Literature. From the Earliest Times to the Present.<\/span> Oxford, 1984. Clarendon Press. 582 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1985., ItK 2. sz., pp. 234-237.)
\nId\u0151, n\u00e9z\u0151pont \u00e9s \u00e9rt\u00e9kszerkezet az Aranys\u00e1rk\u00e1nyban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1985., ItK 1. sz., pp. 64-75.)
\nDieter P. Lotze: Imre Mad\u00e1ch.<\/span> Boston, 1981. Twayne Publishers, A Division of H. K. Hall and Co. (Twayne’s World Author Series. A Survey of the World’s Literature. Hungary, ed. Enik\u0151 Moln\u00e1r Basa.) 173 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1985., ItK 1. sz., pp. 129-131.)
\nHunyadi Brunauer, Dalma–Brunauer, Stephen: Dezs\u0151 Kosztol\u00e1nyi.<\/span> M\u00fcnchen, 1983. 250 pp. (Ver\u00f6ffentlichungen des Finnisch-Ugrischen Seminars an der Universit\u00e4t M\u00fcnchen. Herausgegeben von Gerhard Ganschow. Serie C, Miscellania. Band 15.) (pdf<\/a>, 1985., Hungarian Studies 2. sz., pp. 307-309.)
\nS\u00f3haj a m\u00e9lyb\u0151l: Thomas De Quincey: Egy angol \u00f3piumev\u0151 vallom\u00e1sai. Ford\u00edtotta Tandori Dezs\u0151.<\/span> Eur\u00f3pa K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, 1983. (pdf<\/a>, 1985., Nagyvil\u00e1g pp. 1249-1951.)
\nLe courant symboliste dans la litt\u00e9rature de langues Europ\u00e9ennes. Anna Balakian, ed., The Symbolist Movement in the Literature of European Languages<\/span> (Budapest: Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3, 1982) 732 p. (A Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages) (pdf<\/a>, 1984., Neohelicon XI\/2., pp. 271-283.)
\nN\u00e9z\u0151pont \u00e9s \u00e9rt\u00e9kszerkezet a V\u00e9res k\u00f6lt\u0151ben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1984., Literatura 3. sz., pp. 351-358.)
\nSymbolism and Poetry in the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1984., Neohelicon pp. 135-145.)
\nM\u00faltat \u00e1trendez\u0151 jelen. Vil\u00e1girodalmi t\u00e1vlat \u00e9s nemzeti hagyom\u00e1ny<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1984., Kort\u00e1rs 1. sz., pp. 319-325.)
\nA kimondatlan k\u00f6lt\u00e9szete. Esterh\u00e1zy P\u00e9ter: Fuharosok<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1984., Kort\u00e1rs 1. sz., pp. 153-157.)
\nZalabai Zsigmond: T\u0171n\u0151d\u00e9s a tr\u00f3pusokon.<\/span> Pozsony, 1981. Mad\u00e1ch K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, 214. (pdf<\/a>, 1984., Helikon pp. 359-361.)
\nSam Beck and John W. Cole, eds.: Ethnicity and Nationalism in Southeastern Europe.<\/span> Antropologisch-Sociologisch Centrum. Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1981. 144 l. (Papers on European and Mediterranean Societies. No. 14.) (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Hungarol\u00f3giai \u00c9rtes\u00edt\u0151 5, 1-2., pp. 270-272.)
\nA lev\u00e9l\u00edr\u00f3 Arany<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Diakonia 2. sz., pp. 58-64.)
\nEgy kisebbs\u00e9g f\u00e1jdalmas \u00f6nvizsg\u00e1lata. Grendel Lajos: Galeri.<\/span> Mad\u00e1ch K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, Pozsony, 1982. (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Mozg\u00f3 Vil\u00e1g 1. sz., pp. 90-92.)
\nM\u00e1t\u00f3l: Kem\u00e9ny Zsigmond a k\u00e9perny\u0151n. Az \u00d6zvegy \u00e9s le\u00e1nya<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Magyar H\u00edrlap 1983. december 8., pp. 6.)
\nA k\u00eds\u00e9rleti vers\u00edr\u00e1s es\u00e9lyei<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Kort\u00e1rs 2. sz., pp. 1988-1991.)
\nRichard E. Amacher and Victor Lange, eds.: New Perspectives in German Literary Criticism. A Collection of Essays.<\/span> Princeton, New Jersey, 1979. Princeton University Press, 480. (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Helikon, pp. 78-79.)
\nAnna Balakian, ed.: The Symbolist Movement in the Literature of European Languages.<\/span> Budapest, 1982. Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3, 732. (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Helikon, pp. 73-77.)
\nRoland Barthes: L’obvie et l’obtus. Essais critiques III.<\/span> Paris, 1982. \u00c9ditions du Seuil. (Collection Tel Quel, dirig\u00e9e par Philippe Sollers); Jonathan Culler: Roland Barthes. New York, 1983. Oxford University Press, 130. (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Helikon pp. 467-468.)
\nMichael Riffaterre: Semiotics of Poetry<\/span> Bloomington, 1978. Indiana University Press & London, 1980. Methuen, 213. – Michael Riffaterre: La production du texte Paris, 1979. \u00c9ditions du Seuil, 287. (Collection Po\u00e9tique). (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Helicon, pp. 468-469.)
\nSam Beck and John W. Cole, eds.: Ethnicity and Nationalism in Southeastern Europe.<\/span> (Papers on European Mediterranean Societies. No. 14.) Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1981. Antropologisch-Sociologisch Centrum, 144. (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Helikon pp. 254-255.)
\nToward a Reinterpretation of European Literary History<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1976-1982., Cahiers d’Histoire Litt\u00e9raire Compar\u00e9e 1-7., pp. 289-302.)
\nSusan Sniader Lanser: The Narrative Act. Point of View in Prose Fiction.<\/span> Princeton, New Jersey, 1981. Princeton University Press, 308.
\n(pdf<\/a>, 1983., Helikon pp. 87-88.)
\nBevezet\u0151<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1983., Helikon, pp. 5-7.)
\nV\u00e1ndor\u00e9nek: Nyugat-eur\u00f3pai \u00e9s tengerent\u00fali magyar k\u00f6lt\u0151k. B\u00e9l\u00e1di Mikl\u00f3s, ed.<\/span> Budapest. Sz\u00e9pirodalmi. 1981. 402 pages (pdf<\/a>, 1982., World Literature Today Vol. 56, No. 3, Varia Issue (Summer), pp. 548.)
\nA retorika alkalmaz\u00e1s\u00e1nak lehet\u0151s\u00e9ge az oktat\u00e1sban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Literatura 1.sz., pp. 139-156.)
\nElhunyt J\u00e9kely Zolt\u00e1n<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Magyar H\u00edrlap 1982. m\u00e1rcius 21., pp. 4.)
\nRadn\u00f3ti S\u00e1ndor: A szenved\u0151 misztikus. (Misztika \u00e9s l\u00edra \u00f6sszef\u00fcgg\u00e9se).<\/span> Bp. 1981. Akad\u00e9miai K. 128 I. (Opus. Irodalomelm\u00e9leti tanulm\u00e1nyok 7.) (pdf<\/a>, 1982., ItK 4. sz., pp. 499-502.)
\nT\u00f6bb\u00e9rtelm\u0171s\u00e9g a Puszt\u00e1k n\u00e9p\u00e9ben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Alf\u00f6ld pp. 53-60.)
\nP\u00e9ld\u00e1zat a bels\u0151 f\u00fcggetlens\u00e9gr\u0151l: Ottlik G\u00e9za: Iskola a hat\u00e1ron<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Alf\u00f6ld 10. sz., pp. 52-64.)
\nAnnie Dillard: Living by Fiction.<\/span> New York, 1982. Harper and Row, 192. (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Helikon pp. 624.)
\nSusan R. Suleiman and Inge Crosman, eds.: The Reader in the Text. Esssays on Audience and Interpretation.<\/span> Princeton, New Jersey, 1980. Princeton University Press, 441. (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Helikon pp. 605-607.)
\nThomas L. Pangle: Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Liberalism. A Commentary on The Spirit of the Laws.<\/span> Chicago, 1973. The University of Chicago Press, 336. (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Helikon pp. 454-455.)
\nStuart Sykes: Les romans de Claude Simon.<\/span> Paris, 1979. Les \u00c9ditions de Minuit, 195. (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Helikon pp. 160-161.)
\nPierre Bourdieu: Questions de sociologie.<\/span> Paris, 1980. Les \u00c9ditions de Minuit, 269. (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Helikon pp. 150-152.)
\nL\u00e1tom\u00e1s a t\u00f6rt\u00e9nelem d\u00e9monikus mozg\u00e1s\u00e1r\u00f3l: Claude Simon: Les G\u00e9orgiques (Georgica).<\/span> Les Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1981; La terre et la guerre dans l’oeuvre de Claude Simon (A f\u00f6ld \u00e9s a h\u00e1bor\u00fa Clauda Simon \u00e9letm\u0171v\u00e9ben). Critique, Paris, 1981. november. (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Nagyvil\u00e1g pp. 1248-1250.)
\nA kif\u00fcrk\u00e9szhetetlen tal\u00e1ny: Claude Ollier: Le Jeu d’enfant (A gy\u00e9rmekj\u00e1t\u00e9k).<\/span> Les Editions de Minuit – Gallimard Union g\u00e9n\u00e9rale d’\u00e9dition, Paris, 1958-1975; Marrakch Medine. Flammarion, Paris, 1979. (pdf<\/a>, 1982., Nagyvil\u00e1g pp. 1250-1251.)
\nA tanulm\u00e1ny\u00edr\u00f3 N\u00e9meth L\u00e1szl\u00f3 \u00e9rt\u00e9krendj\u00e9r\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Literatura 1982\/1, pp. 181-194.)
\nTanuls\u00e1g\u00e1t\u00f3l megfosztott t\u00f6rt\u00e9nelem. Grendel Lajos: \u00c9lesl\u00f6v\u00e9szet. Nem(zetis\u00e9gi) antireg\u00e9ny.<\/span> Mad\u00e1ch K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, Pozsony, 1981. (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Mozg\u00f3 Vil\u00e1g 2. sz., pp. 126-128.)
\nA meg\u00e9rt\u00e9s rem\u00e9ny\u00e9ben. [Vladim\u00edr Min\u00e1c: \u00d6sszef\u00fcgg\u00e9sek]<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Mozg\u00f3 Vil\u00e1g 2. sz. pp. 21-27.)
\nR\u00e1ba Gy\u00f6rgy monogr\u00e1fi\u00e1ja. Babits Mih\u00e1ly k\u00f6lt\u00e9szete 1903-1920<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Kort\u00e1rs 2. sz., pp. 1809-1812.)
\nArany \u00e9letm\u0171v\u00e9nek v\u00e1ltoz\u00f3 meg\u00edt\u00e9l\u00e9s\u00e9r\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1981., ItK 5-6. sz., pp. 561-580.)
\nRobert Buttel: Wallace Stevens. The Making of Harmonium.<\/span> Princeton, New Jersey, 1967. Princeton University Press, 269; Robert F. Storey: Pierrot. A Critical History of a Mask. Princeton, New Jersey, 1978. Princeton University Press, 224. (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Helikon pp. 101.)
\nDorrit Cohn: Transparent Minds. Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction<\/span> Princeton, N. J., 1978. Princeton University Press, 331. (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Helikon pp. 320-321.)
\nPatricia Drechsel Tobin: Time and the Novel. The Genealogical Imperative.<\/span> Princeton, N. J., 1978. Princeton University Press, 235. (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Helikon pp. 85-86.)
\nHenry James munk\u00e1ss\u00e1g\u00e1nak fejl\u0151d\u00e9st\u00f6rt\u00e9neti hely\u00e9r\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Filol\u00f3giai K\u00f6zl\u00f6ny pp. 67-73.)
\nK\u00e9t \u00fajabb v\u00e9lem\u00e9ny a Magyar N\u00e9prajzi Lexikonr\u00f3l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Ethnogr\u00e1fia 92., pp. 549-552.)
\nEgy lez\u00e1rtnak hitt \u00e9letm\u0171 \u00fajabb \u00e1llom\u00e1sa: Samuel Beckett: compagnie.<\/span> Les \u00c9ditions de Minuit, Paris, 1980. (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 133-135.)
\nElaine Feinstein<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 917-919.)
\nAz amerikai k\u00f6lt\u00e9szet ismeretlen hagyom\u00e1nya: Szavak a sz\u00e9lbe.<\/span> Eur\u00f3pa K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, 1980. (pdf<\/a>, 1981., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 1252-1254.)
\nRise and Fall of Ossian<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1980., Neohelicon pp. 327-340.)
\nHajn\u00f3czy kilovagol\/80. MV 1980\/1: A parancs; 1980\/8: J\u00e9zus menyasszonya; 1980\/11: Novell\u00e1k<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1980., Mozg\u00f3 Vil\u00e1g 2. sz., pp. 100-103.)
\nRaymond Williams m\u0171vel\u0151d\u00e9st\u00f6rt\u00e9n\u00e9sz: Kult\u00far\u00e1r\u00f3l \u00e9s civiliz\u00e1ci\u00f3r\u00f3l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1980., Magyar H\u00edrlap 1980. janu\u00e1r 6., pp. 8.)
\nBesz\u00e9lget\u00e9s Ernst Gombrich m\u0171v\u00e9szett\u00f6rt\u00e9n\u00e9sszel: M\u0171v\u00e9szet \u00e9s konvenci\u00f3<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1980., Magyar H\u00edrlap 1980. febru\u00e1r 3., pp. 8.)
\nPhyllis Rose: A Life of Virginia Woolf.<\/span> New York, 1978. Oxford University Press, 298. (pdf<\/a>, 1988., Helikon, pp. 188-189.)
\nA tov\u00e1bbl\u00e9p\u00e9s neh\u00e9zs\u00e9gei<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1980., Mozg\u00f3 Vil\u00e1g 11. sz., pp. 100-103.)
\nAz amerikai neo-avantgarde pr\u00f3zaelm\u00e9lete. William H. Gass: The World Within the Word. Essays.<\/span> Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1979. (pdf<\/a>, 1980., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 288-289.)
\nModern Hungarian Poetry. Edited, and with an Introduction, by Mikl\u00f3s Vajda. Foreword by William Jay Smith.<\/span> Corvina Press, Budapest, in co-production with Columbia University Press, New York (and) Guildford, Surrey, 1977. 289 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Hungarol\u00f3giai \u00c9rtes\u00edt\u0151 1., pp. 87-88.)
\nAz elbesz\u00e9l\u0151 n\u00e9z\u0151pont \u00f6sszetetts\u00e9ge Kem\u00e9ny Zsigmond sz\u00e9ppr\u00f3zai m\u0171veiben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1979., MTA I. Oszt. K\u00f6zl. 31, 3-4., pp. 411-441.)
\n\u201eA reg\u00e9ny, amint \u00edrja \u00f6nmag\u00e1t\u201d. Esterh\u00e1zy P\u00e9ter: Termel\u00e9si-reg\u00e9ny (kisssreg\u00e9ny)<\/span> Bp. 1979, Magvet\u0151 474 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Mozg\u00f3 Vil\u00e1g 1. sz., pp. 120-123.)
\nR\u00e9tegek a m\u0171alkot\u00e1s jelent\u00e9s\u00e9ben \u00e9s befogad\u00e1s\u00e1ban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Literatura 1. sz., pp. 7-21.)
\nM\u00edtosz \u00e9s t\u00f6rt\u00e9netmond\u00e1s<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Ethnogr\u00e1fia 90. 3. sz., pp. 342-353.)
\nA T\u00fcnd\u00e9rkert m\u0171faja \u00e9s vil\u00e1gk\u00e9pe<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Alf\u00f6ld 7. sz., pp. 74-83.)
\nVeress D\u00e1niel: Szerettem a s\u00f6t\u00e9tet \u00e9s sz\u00e9lz\u00fag\u00e1st. Kem\u00e9ny Zsigmond \u00e9lete \u00e9s m\u0171ve. Kismonogr\u00e1fia.<\/span> Kolozsv\u00e1r 1977. Dacia K. 206 l. + 24 t. (pdf<\/a>, 1979., ItK 2. sz., pp. 206-208.)
\nReinhard Lahme: Zur literarischen Praxis b\u00fcrgerlicher Emanzipationsbestrebungen: Robert Eduard Prutz. Ein Kapitel aus den Anf\u00e4ngen der akademischen Literaturwissenschaft im 19. Jahrhundert.<\/span> Erlangen, 1977. Verlag Palm und Enke, 299. (Erlanger Studien Bd. 7) (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Helikon pp. 432.)
\nHankiss Elem\u00e9r: \u00c9rt\u00e9k \u00e9s t\u00e1rsadalom. Tanulm\u00e1nyok az \u00e9rt\u00e9kszociol\u00f3gia k\u00f6r\u00e9b\u0151l.<\/span> Budapest, 1977. Magvet\u0151, 393. (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Helikon, pp. 432-434.)
\nA fenomenol\u00f3gia diadala \u00e9s buktat\u00f3i. Roman Ingarden: Az irodalmi m\u0171alkot\u00e1s.<\/span> Gondolat K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, 1977. (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 449-451.)
\nEgy \u00edr\u00f3i mozgalom elm\u00e9leti tanuls\u00e1gai. Jean Ricardou: Nouveaux probl\u00e9mes du roman.<\/span> \u00c9ditions du Seuil, Paris, 1978. (pdf<\/a>, 1979., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 1253-1254.)
\nA felvil\u00e1gosod\u00e1s \u00e9s a romantika tragikum-\u00e9rtelmez\u00e9seinek n\u00e9h\u00e1ny jellemz\u0151 von\u00e1sa \u00e9rt\u00e9kelm\u00e9leti szemsz\u00f6gb\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1978., MTA I. Oszt. K\u00f6zl. 30., pp. 91-98.)
\nAz elbesz\u00e9l\u0151 \u00e9s a szerepl\u0151 viszonya Kem\u00e9ny Zsigmond reg\u00e9nyeiben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1978., Literatura 1-2. sz., pp. 3-25.)
\nN\u00e9meth G. B\u00e9l\u00e1val besz\u00e9lget Szegedy-Masz\u00e1k Mih\u00e1ly<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1978., Jelenkor 1. sz., pp. 458-464.)
\nR\u00f3nay L\u00e1szl\u00f3: Kosztol\u00e1nyi Dezs\u0151.<\/span> Bp. 1977. Gondolat K. 307 l. (Nagy magyar \u00edr\u00f3k) (pdf<\/a>, 1978., ItK 5. sz., pp. 730-735.)
\nBojt\u00e1r Endre: A kelet-eur\u00f3pai avantgarde irodalom.<\/span> Budapest, 1977. Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3, 158. (Modern filol\u00f3giai f\u00fczetek 29.) (pdf<\/a>, 1978., Helikon, pp. 511-512.)
\nThe Concept of the Tragic from the Enlightenment to Romanticism<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1977., MTA Acta Acta Litteraria Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, pp. 152-158.)
\nBerzsenyi verst\u00edpusair\u00f3l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1977., ItK 1. sz., pp. 43-50.)
\nIn memoriam Szenczi Mikl\u00f3s<\/span> (1904–1977) (pdf<\/a>, 1977., Helikon, pp. 519.)
\nSzerdahelyi Istv\u00e1n: A magyar eszt\u00e9tika t\u00f6rt\u00e9nete (1945–1975).<\/span> Budapest, 1976. Kossuth K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, 564. (pdf<\/a>, 1977., Helikon pp. 484-486.)
\nK\u00f6lt\u0151i megform\u00e1lts\u00e1g Kem\u00e9ny Zsigmond politikai jellemrajzaiban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1976., ItK 3. sz., pp. 352-366.)
\nB\u00e9la Pomog\u00e1ts: Tibor D\u00e9ry.<\/span> Budapest. Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3. 1974. (pdf<\/a>, 1976., Books Abroad Vol. 50, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 206-208.)
\nLe r\u00eave et la vision dans la po\u00e9sie de V\u00f6r\u00f6smarty<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1976., MTA Acta Litteraria Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae T. 18, 3-4., pp. 267-278.)
\nId\u0151 \u00e9s t\u00e9r Kem\u00e9ny Zsigmond reg\u00e9nyeiben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1976., Literatura 2. sz., pp. 53-79.)
\nEl\u0151zetes \u00e9szrev\u00e9telek a m\u0171v\u00e9szeti-t\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi nevel\u00e9s \u00e1talak\u00edt\u00e1s\u00e1r\u00f3l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1976., Literatura 1.sz., pp. 145-155.)
\nJulia Kristeva: Le texte du roman. Approche s\u00e9miologique d’une structure discursive transformationnelle.<\/span> The Hague\u2014Paris, 1970. Mouton, 209. (pdf<\/a>, 1976., Helikon pp. 668-670.)
\nBonyhai G\u00e1bor: Az \u00e9rt\u00e9kek rendszere Thomas Mann ,,A kiv\u00e1lasztott” c\u00edm\u0171 reg\u00e9ny\u00e9ben.<\/span> Budapest, 1974. Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3, 188. (pdf<\/a>, 1976., Helikon, pp. 144-146.)
\nA k\u00f6lt\u0151ileg megform\u00e1lt vil\u00e1gk\u00e9p elemz\u00e9s\u00e9r\u0151l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1975., Literatura 1. sz., pp. 74-80.)
\nAz essz\u00e9\u00edr\u00f3 dilemm\u00e1ja: \u00e9lm\u00e9ny vagy te\u00f3ria. S\u00fck\u00f6sd Mih\u00e1ly: Kil\u00e1t\u00f3.<\/span> Sz\u00e9pirodalmi K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, 1974. (pdf<\/a>, 1975., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 1750-1753.)
\nAbraham A. Moles: Inform\u00e1ci\u00f3elm\u00e9let \u00e9s eszt\u00e9tikai \u00e9lm\u00e9ny<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1974., Literatura, pp. 145-147.)
\nA m\u0171v\u00e9szi ism\u00e9tl\u0151d\u00e9s n\u00e9h\u00e1ny alapt\u00edpusa<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1974., Literatura 2. sz., pp. 114-125.)
\nFejl\u0151d\u00e9si szakaszok K\u00f6lcsey vil\u00e1gszeml\u00e9let\u00e9ben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1974., ItK 6. sz., pp. 670-687.)
\nA Po\u00e9tai harmonistica eur\u00f3pai h\u00e1ttere<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1974., ItK 5. sz., pp. 582-588.)
\nPaul Hernadi: Beyond Genre. New Directions in Literary Classification.<\/span> Ithaca and London, 1972. Cornell University Press, 224. (pdf<\/a>, 1974., Helikon, pp. 525-527.)
\nMikl\u00f3s Szentkuthy. II. Szilveszter m\u00e1sodik \u00e9lete.<\/span> Budapest. Magvet\u0151. 1972. 427 pages. (pdf<\/a>, 1973., Books Abroad Vol. 47, No. 4 (Autumn), pp. 804.)
\nLife-Conception and Structure in \u201cThe Tragedy of Man\u201d<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1973., MTA Acta Litteraria Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, pp. 327-335.)
\n“A klasszicizmus, a felvil\u00e1gosod\u00e1s \u00e9s a romantika k\u00e9rd\u00e9sei. [GERAL D R. CRAGG (szerk.): The Cambridge Platonists.<\/span> New York, 1968. Oxford University Press, 451.]” (pdf<\/a>, 1973., Helikon, pp. 550-560.)
\nGergely Andr\u00e1s: Sz\u00e9chenyi eszmerendszer\u00e9nek kialakul\u00e1sa<\/span> Bp. 1972. Akad\u00e9miai K. 177 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1973., ItK 6. sz., pp. 753-758.)
\nL\u00e9t\u00e9rtelmez\u00e9s \u00e9s szerkezet Az ember trag\u00e9di\u00e1j\u00e1ban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1973., ItK 4. sz., pp. 403-408.)
\nPet\u0151fi t\u00fcze. Tanulm\u00e1nyok Pet\u0151fi S\u00e1ndorr\u00f3l. Megjelent Pet\u0151fi S\u00e1ndor sz\u00fclet\u00e9s\u00e9nek 150. \u00e9vfordul\u00f3j\u00e1ra. Szerkesztette: Tam\u00e1s Anna \u00e9s W\u00e9ber Antal.<\/span> Bp. 1972. Kossuth K. \u2014 Zr\u00ednyi Katonai K. 578 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1973., ItK 1. sz., pp. 113-115.)
\nG\u00e9rard Genette: Figures, I–III.<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1973., Helikon pp. 393-396.)
\nA. J. Greimas\u2014R. Jakobson\u2014M. R. Mayenova\u2014Sz. \u041a. Saumjan\u2014W. Steinitz\u2014S. \u017b\u00f3\u0142kiewski (szerk.): Sign, Language, Culture.<\/span> The Hague-Paris, 1970. Mouton, 723; Julia Kristeva\u2014Josette Rey-Debove-Donna J. Umiker (szerk.): Essays in Semiotics.<\/span> The Hague-Paris, 1971. Mouton, 639.
\nCharles Morris: Writings on the General Theory of Signs.<\/span> The Hague-Paris, 1971. Mouton, 486. (pdf<\/a>, 1973., Helikon, pp. 424-425.)
\nLes critiques de notre temps et le Nouveau Roman. Pr\u00e9sentation par R\u00e9al Ouellet.<\/span> Paris, 1972. Garnier, 172. (pdf<\/a>, 1973., Helikon, pp. 450-452.)
\nReg\u00e9nyelm\u00e9let \u00e9s reg\u00e9nyelemz\u00e9s — ROBERT MURRAY DAVIS (ed.): The Novel: Modern Essays in Criticism.<\/span> Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1969 . Prentice-Hall. 324; Louis D. RUBIN , Jr: The Teller in the Tale.<\/span> Seattle and London, 1967 . University of Washington Press. 228; PHILIP STEVICK: The Chapter in Fiction: Theories of Narrative Division.<\/span> Syracuse, N. Y., 1970. Syracuse University Press. 188; STUART MILLER: The Picaresque Novel.<\/span> Cleveland and London, 1967 . The Press of Case Western Reserve University. 164; MARY ROHRBERGER : Hawthorne and the Modern Short Story.<\/span> The Hague and Paris, 1966. Mouton. 148; DAVID L. MINTER : The Interpreted Design as a Structural Principle in American Prose.<\/span> New Haven, 1969. Yale University Press. 246; PETER EGRI: Avantgardism and Modernism: A Comparison of James Joyce’s \u201eUlysses” with Thomas Mann’s \u201eDer Zauberberg” and \u201eLotte in Weimar”.<\/span> Budapest, 1972. Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3. 117; MAGYAR MIKL\u00d3S: Reg\u00e9ny vagy \u201e\u00faj reg\u00e9ny”? Reg\u00e9nytechnika \u00e9s \u00edr\u00f3i magatart\u00e1s a francia \u201e\u00faj reg\u00e9nyben”.<\/span> Budapest, 1971. Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3. 172; JOHN STURROCK: The French New Novel: Claude Simon, Michel Butor, Alain Robbe-Grillet.<\/span> London, 1969. Oxford University Press. 244; ANNIE GOLDMANN: Cin\u00e9ma et soci\u00e9t\u00e9 moderne: Le cin\u00e9ma de 1958 \u00e0 1968: Godard, Antonioni, Resnais, Robbe-Grillet.<\/span> Paris, 1971. \u00c9ditions Anthropos. 248; WALLACE FOWLIE: A Reading of Proust.<\/span> London, 1967. Dennis Dobson. 307; GERMAINE BR\u00c9E: Marcel Proust and Deliverance from Time.<\/span> New Brunswick, N . J., 1969. Rutgers University Press. 252; MOHAY B\u00c9LA: Ford Madox Ford \u00edr\u00f3i vil\u00e1gk\u00e9pe.<\/span> Budapest, 1971 . Akad\u00e9miai Kiad\u00f3. 170; WALTER ISLE: Experiments in Form: Henry James’s Novels, 1896\u20141901.<\/span> Cambridge, Mass., 1968. Harvard University Press. 251; BRUCE MORRISSETTE: Les romans de Robbe-Grillet. Pr\u00e9face de Roland Barthes.<\/span> Paris, 1971. Les \u00c9ditions de Minuit. 309. (pdf<\/a>, 1973., Helikon, pp. 167-174.)
\n[“Jelenleg irodalomoktat\u00e1sunk\u2026”]<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1973., Irodalomt\u00f6rt\u00e9net, pp. 435-436.)
\nKem\u00e9ny Zsigmond: \u00c9let \u00e9s irodalom. Tanulm\u00e1nyok. Szerkesztette, az ut\u00f3sz\u00f3t \u00e9s a jegyzeteket \u00edrta: T\u00f3th Gyula.<\/span> Bp. 1971. Sz\u00e9pirodalmi K. 453 l. (K. Zs. m\u0171vei) (pdf<\/a>, 1972., ItK 5-6. sz., pp. 719-723.)
\nN\u00e9meth G. B\u00e9la: M\u0171 \u00e9s szem\u00e9lyis\u00e9g. Irodalmi tanulm\u00e1nyok.<\/span> Bp. 1970. Magvet\u0151 K. 750 l. (Elvek \u00e9s utak) (pdf<\/a>, 1972., ItK 3. sz., pp. 383-387.)
\nVil\u00e1gk\u00e9p \u00e9s st\u00edlus Pet\u0151fi k\u00f6lt\u00e9szet\u00e9ben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1972., ItK 4. sz., pp. 441-456.)
\nMichael Riffaterre: Essais de stylistique structurale. Pr\u00e9sentation et traduction par Daniel Delas.<\/span> Paris, 1971. Flammarion, 365. (pdf<\/a>, 1972., Helikon, pp. 264-266.)
\nFogalmi rendszer \u00e9s eszt\u00e9tikai hat\u00e1s (Fasiszta \u00edr\u00f3-e D. H. Lawrence?) — John R. Harrison: The Reactionaries. Yeats, Lewis, Pound, Eliot, Lawrence. A Study of the Anti-Democratic Intelligentsia.<\/span> New York, 1967, Schocken Books, 224; Norman J. Fedder: The influence of D. H. Lawrence on Tennessee Williams.<\/span> The Hague, 1966. Mouton and Co., 131; John E. Stoll: D. H. Lawrence’s \u201eSons and Lovers”. Self-Encounter and the Unknown Self.<\/span> Muncie, Indiana, 1968. Ball State University, 48; H. M. Daleski: The Forked Flame. A Study of D. H. Lawrence.<\/span> Evanston, 1965. North-western University Press, 320. (pdf<\/a>, 1972., helikon, pp. 266-267.)
\nB. S. Johnson k\u00eds\u00e9rlete az angol “\u00faj reg\u00e9ny” megteremt\u00e9s\u00e9re<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1972., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 434-436.)
\nLajos Kass\u00e1k. \u00d6sszes versei I-II. Budapest.<\/span> Magvet\u0151. 1970. (pdf<\/a>, 1971., Books Abroad Vol. 45, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 169-170.)
\nSzauder J\u00f3zsef: Az Estve \u00e9s az \u00e1lom. (Felvil\u00e1gosod\u00e1s \u00e9s klasszicizmus)<\/span> Bp. 1970. Sz\u00e9pirodalmi K. 557 l. (pdf<\/a>, 1971., ItK 6. sz., pp. 746-749.)
\nWilliam K. Wimsatt Jr.- Cleanth Brooks: Literary Criticism. A Short History.<\/span> New York, 1957. Vintage Books. XV, 755, XXII p. (pdf<\/a>, 1971., ItK 1-2. sz., pp. 230-231.)
\nAz irodalom mint l\u00e9t\u00e9rtelmez\u00e9s: a genfi kritikai iskola — Sarah N. Lawall: Critics of Consciousness. The Existential Structures of Literature.<\/span> Cambridge, Mass., 1968. Harvard UP. 281. \u2014 Georges Poulet: Les m\u00e9tamorphoses du cercle.<\/span> Paris, 1961. Plon. 523. \u2014 Jean-Pierre Richard: \u00c9tudes sur le Romantisme.<\/span> Paris, 1970. Seuil. 283. (pdf<\/a>, 1971., Helikon, pp. 492-494.)
\n“A sztoikus Byron — Leslie A. Marchand: Byron’s Poetry. A Critical Introduction.<\/span> Cambridge, Mass., 1968. Harvard University Press, 261; M. G. Cooke: The Blind Man Traces the Circle. On the Patterns and Philosophy of Byron’s Poetry.<\/span> Princeton, N. J., 1969. Princeton University Press, 227.” (pdf<\/a>, 1971., Helikon, pp. 94-95.)
\nA reg\u00e9ny t\u00e1rsszerz\u0151je: az olvas\u00f3. Robert Pinget: Passacaille.<\/span> Les \u00c9ditions de Minuit, 1969. (pdf<\/a>, 1971., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 124-126.)
\nA vari\u00e1ci\u00f3s szerkeszt\u00e9s mestere: Alain Robbe-Grillet: Ptojei pom une revolution \u00e4 New York.<\/span> Les Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1970. (pdf<\/a>, 1971., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 1745-1746.)
\nIstv\u00e1n Csurka: N\u00e1sz \u00e9s pofon.<\/span> Budapest. Sz\u00e9pirodalmi. 1969. 468 pages, ill. 28.50 ft. (pdf<\/a>, Books Abroad Vol. 44, No. 4 (Autumn), pp. 698.)
\nAz angolsz\u00e1sz \u00e9s francia stilisztikai kutat\u00e1sok f\u0151bb ir\u00e1nyai<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Helikon, pp. 420-448.)
\nA struktur\u00e1lis vizsg\u00e1lat alkalmaz\u00e1s\u00e1nak lehet\u0151s\u00e9ge az \u00f6sszehasonl\u00edt\u00f3 irodalomtudom\u00e1nyban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Helikon, pp. 238-250.)
\nRenato Poggioli: Teoria dell’arte d’avanguardia.<\/span> Societ\u00e0 \u00e9ditrice il Mulino, 1962; translated from the Italian by Gerald Fitzgerald. Cambridge, Mass., 1968. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 250. (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Helikon, pp. 520-521.)
\nDavid I. Grossvogel: Limits of the Novel. Evolutions of a Form from Chaucer to Robbe-Grillet.<\/span> Ithaca, New York, 1968. Cornell University Press, 347; Herman Meyer: Das Zitat in der Erz\u00e4hlkunst.<\/span> Stuttgart, 1961. J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung. Princeton, New Jersey, 1968. Princeton University Press, 278; Jean Weisgerber: Faulkner et Dosto\u00efevski. Confluences et Influences.<\/span> Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles, 1968. (Universit\u00e9 libre de Bruxelles, Travaux de la Facult\u00e9 de Philosophie et Lettres, Tome XXXIX.) 345. (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Helikon, pp. 279-282.)
\nA leg\u00fajabb stilisztikai irodalomr\u00f3l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Helikon, pp. 473-476.)
\nLaurent LeSage\u2014Andr\u00e9 Yon: Dictionnaire des Critiques Litt\u00e9raires.<\/span> University Park and London, 1969. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 218. (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Helikon, pp. 125.)
\nT. S. Eliot: To Criticize the Critic and Other Writings.<\/span> New York, 1965. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 189. (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Helikon, pp. 122-123.)
\nWallace Stevens: Dal, h\u00e1bor\u00fa v\u00e9g\u00e9n<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Filol\u00f3giai K\u00f6zl\u00f6ny, pp. 529-531.)
\nK\u00e9t \u00edr\u00f3 vil\u00e1ga. S\u00fck\u00f6sd Mih\u00e1ly: Hemingway vil\u00e1ga; P\u00f3k Lajos: Thomas Mann vil\u00e1ga;<\/span> Eur\u00f3pa K\u00f6nyvkiad\u00f3, 1969. (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 130-132.)
\nSarraute \u00faj reg\u00e9ny\u00e9r\u0151l. Nathalie Sarraute: Entre la vie et la mort.<\/span> Gallimard, Paris, 1968. (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 779-780.)
\nA magyar irodalom a Books Abroad c\u00edm\u0171 foly\u00f3iratban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1970., Nagyvil\u00e1g, pp. 923-924.)
\nA XVIII. sz\u00e1zadi angol irodalom a kutat\u00e1s t\u00fckr\u00e9ben<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1969., ItK 2-3. sz., pp. 315-330.)
\nCsokonai: A Mag\u00e1noss\u00e1ghoz<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1969., ItK 2-3. sz., pp. 280-290.)
\nA sz\u00e1zadfordul\u00f3 irodalma az angolsz\u00e1sz kutat\u00e1sban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1969., Helikon, pp. 159-178.)
\nM. L. Rosenthal: The New Poets. American and British Poetry Since World War II.<\/span> New York, 1967. Oxford University Press, 360. (pdf<\/a>, 1969., Helikon, pp. 328-329.)
\nHerbert Marder: Feminism and Art. A Study of Virginia Woolf.<\/span> Chicago and London, 1968. The University of Chicago Press. 190. (pdf<\/a>, 1969., Helikon, 485-486.)
\nSydney J. Krause (ed.): Essays on Determinism in American Literature.<\/span> Kent, Ohio, 1964. The Kent State University Press, 116. (pdf<\/a>, 1969., Helikon, pp. 477-478.)
\nFountainwell Drama Texts. General Editors: T. A. Dunn, Andrew Gurr John Horden, A. Norman Jeffares, R. L. \u0421. Lorimer. Assistant General Editor: Brian W. M. Scobie.<\/span> Edinburgh, 1968\u2014. Oliver and Boyd, 1\u20147. (pdf<\/a>, 1969., Helikon, pp. 331.)
\nAz irodalom \u00e9s a zene p\u00e1rhuzamos vizsg\u00e1lat\u00e1r\u00f3l<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1968., Helikon, pp. 433-445.)
\nAz \u00f6sszehasonl\u00edt\u00f3 irodalomtudom\u00e1ny oktat\u00e1sa az Amerikai Egyes\u00fclt \u00c1llamokban<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, 1968., Helikon, pp. 582-583.)
\nRichard Lettis–William E. Morris: A Wutherring Heights Handbook.<\/span> New York, 1961. The Odyssey Press, 246. (pdf<\/a>, 1968., Helikon, pp. 294.)
\nWilliam Empson: Milton’s God.<\/span> London, 1961. Chatto and Windus. 280. (pdf<\/a>, 1968., helikon, pp. 160-161.)
\nNoel Stock: Poet in Exile, Ezra Pound.<\/span> New York, 1964. Barnes and Noble. 273. (pdf<\/a>, 1968., Helikon, pp. 152-153.)
\nIrving Ribner: Patterns in Shakespearian Tragedy.<\/span> London, 1962 (1960). Methuen, 205. \u2014 Jacobean Tragedy. London, 1962. Methuen, 179. (pdf<\/a>, 1968., Helikon, pp. 161-.)<\/p>\n

\u00d6sszehasonl\u00edt\u00f3 irodalomtudom\u00e1ny<\/p>\n

Rapports entre la structure po\u00e9ique et le style dans la po\u00e9sie europ\u00e9enne entre les lumi\u00e8res et le romantisme. (Premi\u00e8re partie)<\/p>\n

La structure du po\u00e8me entre les lumi\u00e8res et le romantisme. (Deuxi\u00e8me partie)<\/p>\n

Notes Toward the Historical Definition of Realism<\/p>\n

The Conditions and Stages of a Comparative Study<\/p>\n

V\u00f6r\u00f6smarty \u00e9s a romantikus t\u00f6red\u00e9k<\/p>\n

Romantika, biedermeier, realizmus<\/p>\n

Esti Korn\u00e9l<\/p>\n

Henry James and Reader-Response Criticism. (The Figure in the Carpet)<\/p>\n

Henry James<\/p>\n

Bryan Stanley Johnson<\/p>\n

Ronald Salmon Crane<\/p>\n

Richard John Jefferies<\/p>\n

cselekm\u00e9nytelens\u00e9g<\/p>\n

Ralph Waldo Emerson<\/p>\n

Sir John Harington<\/p>\n

Maurice Henry Hewlett<\/p>\n

James Orchard Halliwell-Phillipps<\/p>\n

William Empson<\/p>\n

Donald Alfred Davie<\/p>\n

elbesz\u00e9l\u0151 n\u00e9z\u0151pont<\/p>\n

Thomas De Quincey<\/p>\n

domin\u00e1ns<\/p>\n

Semantic Strata in Narrative Texts<\/p>\n

Sz\u00e9chenyi Istv\u00e1n V\u00e1logatott M\u0171vei. A v\u00e1logat\u00e1s, a sz\u00f6veggondoz\u00e1s, a jegyzetek \u00e9s az ut\u00f3sz\u00f3 Gergely Andr\u00e1s, Spira Gy\u00f6rgy \u00e9s Sashegyi Oszk\u00e1r munk\u00e1ja. Szerkesztette Spira Gy\u00f6rgy. Budapest, Sz\u00e9pirodalmi Kiad\u00f3, 1991. 1. k\u00f6t. 1799-1840. 903 l. II. k\u00f6t. 1841-1860. 1124 l. III. k\u00f6t. \u00d6nismeret 1337 l. (Magyar Remek\u00edr\u00f3k)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Fogadtat\u00e1s \/ reception<\/span>
\nSzerda<\/span>, 2003 (pdf<\/a>)<\/p>\n

N\u00e9pszabads\u00e1g, 2003\/10<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, pp. 401.)<\/p>\n

Alf\u00f6ld, 1996<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, pp. 126-129.)<\/p>\n

N\u00e9pszabads\u00e1g, 1995\/04<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, pp. 446.)<\/p>\n

Magyar Nemzet, 1987\/10<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, pp. 86.)<\/p>\n

Magyar Nemzet, 1987\/03<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, pp. 196.)<\/p>\n

Magyar Nemzet, 1979\/02<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, pp. 128.)<\/p>\n

Magyar Nemzet, 1976\/10<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, pp. 48.)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

 
\nInterj\u00fa \/ Interview<\/span>
\n“Amit \u00e9n csin\u00e1ltam, az meg\u0151rz\u00e9se valaminek”<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, \u00c9let \u00e9s irodalom, 2016. j\u00falius 15.)<\/p>\n

Mib\u0151l lesz a vil\u00e1girodalom?<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, \u00c9let \u00e9s tudom\u00e1ny, 2004\/8, pp. 230-233)<\/p>\n

M\u00e1rai, a polg\u00e1r\u00edr\u00f3<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, napi Magyarorsz\u00e1g, 1999. febru\u00e1r 20., pp. 13)<\/p>\n

Ami a mi dolgunk<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Alf\u00f6ld, 1995, pp.34-51.)<\/p>\n

Liberalizmus \u00e9s kult\u00fara – k\u00f6rk\u00e9rd\u00e9s<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Nappalih\u00e1z, 1994\/01, pp. 105-109.)<\/p>\n

Az irodalom\u00e9rt\u00e9s korszer\u0171s\u00e9ge – k\u00f6rk\u00e9rd\u00e9s<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Nappalih\u00e1z, 1992\/02, pp. 77-82.)<\/p>\n

“R\u00e9gi jogaiba \u00e1ll\u00edtani az \u00e9lm\u00e9nyt”<\/span> (pdf<\/a>, Magyar Nemzet, 1983. febru\u00e1r 22., pp. 4.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00cdr\u00e1sok \/ Writings T\u00f6rt\u00e9nelem \u00e9s\/vagy reg\u00e9ny (pdf, Korunk, 2015. 8. sz., pp. 3-12.) Somfai L\u00e1szl\u00f3 sz\u00fclet\u00e9snapj\u00e1ra (pdf, Muzsika 2014. augusztus, pp. 2.) Felejt\u00e9s \u00e9s kisaj\u00e1t\u00edt\u00e1s az irodalomban (pdf, Alf\u00f6ld, 2013., pp. 35-55.) Wagner or Beethoven? Shifts in the Musical Taste of Virginia Woolf (pdf, 2012., Neohelicon 39., pp. 89-103.) A Conversation between Zolt\u00e1n Kocsis and… Continue reading Text<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-89","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/89","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=89"}],"version-history":[{"count":100,"href":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/89\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":695,"href":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/89\/revisions\/695"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/szegedy-maszak.hu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=89"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}